Tuesday, March 1, 2011

How Much Does It Cost Gum Graft Alloderm

Banks need a new breed of lawyers to complete their control of the Company.

To cope with an overwhelming wave of subpoenas in court, the banks have a weapon of mass destruction of client: a new breed of lawyers.

They enjoy lucrative contracts, and easy going. No need to know the right bank, this is not about what terrain they will be worried.

Opposite them, they were stunned opponents, penniless, knowing no law but aware of being victims of criminal acts, even criminals, from their bank. They have gathered their remaining strength in the lawsuit and intend to actually finish if justice is not doing its job.

In these cases, banks are often in complete breach of the law, texts and jurisprudence, and its staff has accumulated faults.

Any company with such charges against her would be untenable and forced to cease trading. For banks, this would be the same, except that their lawyers have a foolproof technique.

First the good artillery preparation. "Responses to conclusions" in which the lies are so big but charged with such aplomb that they become truth. The customer is stunned because it is impossible to disassemble everything in the limited time available. Furthermore, attempting to demonstrate that the bank systematically and grossly ment on all points, is hardly credible. "The bigger it is, the more things happening"

Then we must attack on all the client personally. The technique is in three stages. First, take an innocuous and then mount it and enter pin on the customer's obvious dishonesty. All facts can be used.

Some examples from actual cases (those cited concern Crédit du Nord, but all banks have adopted this technique).

If the client says nothing and does not react:
"By remaining silent, the client approves the operations concerned"

If the customer protests.
"The client is guilty of a epistolary harassment vis-à-vis the bank staff. "

If the customer is familiar with banking techniques.
"The customer uses his knowledge to try not to meet its commitments. "

The client knows nothing.
"How the client can say such things as lack of knowledge of the bank is clear. "The customer is

short:
" The client constantly trying to force the passage of scriptures, forcing staff to take penalties'

The customer is not exposed.
"Coincidentally, the customer quickly covered his behalf without presumably to hide his dishonesty "

The client does not release a revolving credit facility.
"Then he had the opportunity to recover his account, the client was careful to release the amounts that were yet available. Hence his dishonesty. "The client unlocks

a revolving credit facility.
"The customer is engaged in a cavalry financial sanction-act high and justifies the bank's reaction to it."

The customer provides all of its extracts.
"Why the client feels the need to provide a plethora of documents the court? Probably to hide his dishonesty.

The client does not provide extracts where it is unnecessary credit.
"The client willfully fails to deliver the entire file. What is he hiding? Certainly his dishonesty.

The client has signed an account agreement.
"Then he signed an account agreement, the client returns to his signature. How the court can trust such an individual.

The customer has not signed the account agreement.
"He knew he had not signed. And yet, the client has never occurred with staff to sign the document. For what purpose? Guess Mr. President. "


Examples are endless. With a lawyer adept at these techniques, the bank takes full control of proceedings.

It can then enact its own laws. And that is what is happening. The entire court files are mounted in the same way.

Today, it is impossible to fight against such a system which has the money, time and power. The only solution lies in alternatives to the banking system.

Gerard Faure-Kapper

0 comments:

Post a Comment