Unions are concerned about the rising complaints directly against personnel of the banking agencies.
Like other corporations, such as police or hospitals, employees of banks find themselves more and more often face justice for their actions.
So far, customer complaints were the directions. They had the means to counter them. Iron pot clay pot cons people said. It should actually have the nerves and strong backs to attack a bank.
employees feel safe, covered a feeling of immunity. Now being directly targeted, they find not to be supported. Worse, they often Directorate turns against them.
In which case the civil or criminal liability of a bank employee may be engaged?
Generally, whenever their signature on a document is filed, such as withdrawals unfair competition, for example.
Whenever they are the direct source of a disputed transaction.
Every time the act is in violation of the law, including the 313-3 or 311-17 of the Consumer Code. (These items are being violated every day).
They can also be prosecuted for harassment in raises.
The purpose of these complaints, often requests for compensation for damage caused. In the case of companies accounted for bankruptcy or sell real estate at a loss, the adition rises very high.
In extreme cases, including suicides caused by financial situation irretrievably compromised, the employee's interest to have done nothing wrong.
Since the Kerviel affair, the guidelines have not only tend to release their staff, but worse still, to charge.
user associations of banks like ours, have no influence on the decisions of customers. They exercise their right to sue. I remember
Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948:
"Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national courts against acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law. "
Gerard Faure-Kapper
0 comments:
Post a Comment